Thursday, June 22, 2017

Its Time for Full Pool Play in Team Ninja Warrior

So here at GBS, we've tend to focus on sports with sanctioning bodies who have giant rulebooks, scoring mechanisms and usually years of record books and statistics we can dive into.

Today is going to be a little different as we're going to dive into one of the most relatively young sports out there, and a competition withing that sport even younger (2 years old), that to my knowledge, does not have today have a literal rulebook.

So lets talk obstacle courses, specifically Team Ninja Warrior.

For any readers unfamiliar with "Ninja Warrior," it is competition that originated in Japan in 1997 as Sasuke. (this competition would be re-branded and shown with subtitles in the USA as Ninja Warrior). The concept is simple to understand/watch, there are 100 competitors who take turns trying to conquer a ridiculously difficult obstacle course that is split into 4 levels. Only people who complete level 1 move on to level 2 and so forth until all competitors are eliminated or until they all try level 4. Some levels have time limits, some do not. Sasuke has been on for some time now going well over 30 seasons. eight years ago they started making a version in the USA simply known as American Ninja Warrior; with the biggest difference being that ANW starts with several hundreds of competitors in qualifiers around the country qualifying for one of the final 100 spots that get to try the 4-level competition course located in Las Vegas.

The competition/show gets great reviews and at this point there's 20+ countries that have their own national version. While there is some backstory elements to its Tv production, at the end of the day its a sport/competition with concrete rules. Someone who is a genius however realized that there could be a fun out-of-season off-shoot, whereby they team competitors ("ninjas") up, and put them head to head on parallel courses and its generally one of the most exciting sports you will ever see in person or on TV. Honestly it will likely make it to the Olympics within the next decade or 2, or so we hope (remember parkour is currently fighting for a place with the IOC).

Team Ninja Warrior (TNW) competition is simple: you have teams of 3 (2 males 1 female) who take turns matching up against another team to run the course together. Each team member runs once.

The problem, I assume this presented the producers, is that if one match started out 2-0/0-2 then the 3rd race would become pointless. As a result Team Ninja Warrior is formatted as:

Heat 1: 1 point
Heat 2: 1 point
Heat 3: 2 points

If a match ends in a 2-2 point tie, then there is a 4th race to break the tie. You may already see how this is flawed as a "team" competition, but lets keep going before we get into that.

The tournament is comprised of 4-team pools like the World Cup/World Baseball Classic, however only 1 team advances much like the 1st and 3rd rounds of the NCAA College World Series. The big difference being the NCAA baseball tournament pools operate on double elimination. Team Ninja Warrior, for either timing or editing constraints, limits their pools to only 2 rounds/matchups as follows:

Round 1:
A vs. B
C vs. D

Round 2: winners vs. losers of round 1
A vs. C
B vs. D
OR
A vs. D
B vs. C


The 2nd round is the elimination round meaning whoever loses that matchup is out. The two Round 2 winners then go to a single "relay showdown" wherby all 3 members of the teams participate together in a head-to-head relay race on an extended course.

The show has gotten very good ratings considering it was first on the widely unknown Esquire Network, and now moved to USA-Network. Its likely the ratings will stay up, and more tournaments/seasons are coming, which is why we want to take this time to tell the Ninja Warrior governing body that its time to take this seriously as a sporting format, which means fairness should be of the utmost importance. If this is truly meant to be a team competition it should value the best teams...

So what's the problem?


The format of the dual courses is great, the teams of 3 is nice and balanced, its simply the fragmented pool structure/point scoring that needs corrected. In the current format, all four teams can end with a 1-1 record, yet 2 get to advance. If you went down to individual races/matchups (3 per round) you can literally have the teams end:

Team A: 5-1
Team B: 5-1
Team C: 1-5
Team D: 1-5

match result via americanninjawarriornation.com
...and have Teams C and D go to the final showdown. How? Because the way it is setup, the only matchup that really matters is the anchor run in the 2nd round. You can go 0-5 in your first 5 matches, win the final match (worth 2 points) which forces a 2-2 tie-breaker and then you win that tiebreaker to move on. If you count the tie-breaker as its own race it doesn't look much better:

Team A: 5-2
Team B: 5-2
Team C: 2-5
Team D: 2-5

Teams A and B are still clearly the better teams, and they won more scheduled races than both their opponents, so why aren't they advancing?


In the first season of Team Ninja Warrior, this format generally held out ok as the better teams tended to win the 2nd Round anchor matches anyhow. Most winning teams went some variation of 6-0, 5-1, or 5-2 in their races.

But season 2 of Team Ninja Warrior has been a very mixed bag and in some cases a mess from a sporting/fairness standpoint. There have been multiple instances of 5-1 teams being sent home. then there's also been a wild card pool in which they brought back teams who did well but didn't win their pool (some of them those aforementioned 5-1 teams) and those teams proceeded to go 5-1 again without advancing. Multiple instances of teams advancing only due to their captain/anchor. Why?

The point of difference between the Team competition and the normal show is that its supposed to be based on a team collective effort. There was a team one night that went 1-5 where one member literally couldn't get past the 3rd obstacle in 3 different matches, yet they made the final showdown. Why?

So potentially due to time constraints and/or the fear of "pointless" 3rd matches TNW has created a larger issue on the opposite end, only 1 match matters in fragmented pool play. Frankly, if this were a big-time sport with money on the line, a team GM would just have the team sit out the first 5 matches, and put everything into the 2nd anchor run since its the only match that truly matters.


But we here at GBS don't just point out problems and walk away, we need to present a workable solution, so here goes.

Our proposal:


Rule #1 - Team Ninja Warrior should award 1 point for all races, thereby assuring that a better team wins a matchup, not just the team with the strongest anchor.

You may ask: Won't that make the 3rd match pointless if a team is up 2-0? ... don't get ahead of us...

Rule #2 - TNW should adopt round-robin pool play like all other major sporting events. Every team contests a match against all the other 3 teams in the pool.

So what would this look like?

Round 1
A vs. B
C vs. D

Round 2
A vs. C
B vs. D

Round 3
A vs. D
B vs. C

Rule #3 - Final pool rankings decide who moves on to the relay showdown, no more extra races needed, break ties with race results.

Just like the World Cup, WBC, CWS, name any big tournament and that is what pool play looks like. This means each team faces the other 3 in the pool, each team member has 3 matches no matter what.

But what about breaking ties? Like any tournament with pool play, ties are a possible occurrence, with TNW this is no different as follows if looking at the team matchups these are the two most common ties in pool play:

W/L
Team A 3-0
Team B 1-2
Team C 1-2
Team D 1-2
OR

W/L
Team A 2-1
Team B 2-1
Team C 2-1
Team D 0-3

Turns out breaking ties is very easy to do in TNW; go right into what would be the most obvious tiebreaker, cumulative race records. Each team would have 9 races overall ending in records/points like 9-0, 8-1, 7-2, 6-3, 5-4, 4-5, etc.

So now you see how that 3rd race match-up matters even if you are down 0-2. Winning that 3rd match might break a tie for you in the pool.

So now look at the pool with more context:


W/L Points (Race W/L)
Team A 3-0 8-1
Team B 1-2 4-5
Team C 1-2 3-6
Team D 1-2 3-6


Team A dominated, everyone else was even-ish except Team B was able to steal a run from Team A thus winning more races than C and D, tie broken. You can quickly see how this is hugely beneficial.

Solving the "only has a strong anchor" issue: So now what happens when a team has some weaker members but a strong anchor as we've seen a bit this season? Overall they'd go 0-3 with a race record of 3-6.  So the pools would start with standings like this after Team D (strong anchor) has completed all their matches:


W/LPoints
Team A1-02-1
Team B1-02-1
Team C1-02-1
Team D0-33-6

Then the remaining match-ups by default are going to determine who advances. so then lets assume Team A wins all its other matches:


W/LPoints
Team A3-08-1
Team B1-12-4
Team C1-12-4
Team D0-33-6

...that leaves the B vs C match-up to determine who goes to the relay showdown, with your only 2 options being a 3-0 win or 2-1 win by one of those teams:


W/LPoints
Team A3-08-1
Team B2-15-4
Team C1-22-7
Team D0-33-6

OR

W/LPoints
Team A3-08-1
Team B2-14-5
Team C1-23-6
Team D0-33-6

Now we have a clear separation of teams thats in the hands of the teams without making any one member more important than the others. Teams have to take care of winning races/points and not throwing any away and relying on a 2nd anchor run.

Worst Case Scenario... what about ties? So yes, its not always going to end in a perfect 4 team ranking to look at total win/loss and then break ties with points/races. but that doesn' mean we don't still have easy solutions to implement. What if one team dominates and then the remaining 3 teams are closely matched? Mathematically, yes you can end up in a 3-way tie like this:
  • Team A goes undefeated against everyone
  • B beats C 2-1
  • C beats D 2-1
  • D beats B 2-1

W/LPoints
Team A3-09-0
Team B1-23-6
Team C1-23-6
Team D1-23-6

OR
  • Team D loses to everyone outright
  • A beats B 2-1
  • B beats C 2-1
  • C beats A 2-1
W/LPoints
Team A2-15-4
Team B2-15-4
Team C2-15-4
Team D0-30-9


So what do we do about ties in points? Its actually very easy. If 1st and 2nd are tied it doesn't matter, and if 3rd and 4th are tied it doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is ties for 2nd place. In that case we have 2 options:

Option A:

  • Break a 2-way tie by who won their head-to-head match-up.
That works just fine, but also leaves a problem with 3-way ties which leads us to...

Option B:
  • Break ties in points by which team hit the most buzzers
  • Break ties in buzzers hit by least amount of time to hit the buzzers

This would incentive teams to still go out and hit buzzers even if their opponent has fallen. So now we're looking at this:

W/LPointsBuzzersTime to Buzzer
Team A9-05-46
Team B1-23-65
Team C1-23-633m44s
Team D1-23-634m13s

Now we have a clear 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th place team all done via how they performed on the course. It would be rare to need to go to this level, but if needed, its so easy to understand by casual viewers, competitors and there is no gray area. Most importantly it leaves us with no asterisk situations like


So we have very clear and easy and FAIR rules for a tournament to happen within. I don;t think anyone would debate this, and am curious how the ninjas themselves would feel about it.

The last obstacle, how do they fit this into a 1-hour TV show? This takes the most thought but its not hard really, considering many episodes already have 12 races + showdown at a minimum but 16 races + showdown at most, we're really only talking about adding 2-6 races to a pool because the current existing tiebreaker matches would go away, no need for them. If adding 2-6 races is too much there are easy options from there that we don't think are too crazy:

a. extend TV time, the show does well on ratings, it could possibly justify it.

b. editing.  -   They run background pieces on every team and competitor, maybe don't do that and instead just let the announcers announce and talk about it during runs. OR just edit some runs down and do less reality show "here is whats coming next" stuff. They already edit some runs down as it is, and lets be honest, while people watch ANW for stories + competition, anyone watching TNW is pretty much watching for the pure competition. Just look at the amazing Race for an example, not every competitor needs a 3 minute backstory. Just do like modern sports and have the announcers talk competitors' backstory during the competition.

As Team Ninja Warrior grows, this is only going to become more of an issue as fans become connected to teams and their teams get "screwed" so take this opportunity now to adjust.

Thursday, March 9, 2017

Is the World Baseball Classic Accomplishing its Mission?

A quick glance at Twitter these days surrounding the World Baseball Classic and you see a lot about Israel's amazing 3-0 start including wins over 3 teams they were highly expected to lose and lose badly to (S. Korea, Netherlands and Chinese Taipei). Considering Israel was ranked #41 in the world going into this, yeah its pretty big on the scale of unexpected upsets, lets see if they can keep it up.

But you'd be remiss if you ignored a lot of hubub about whether or not this team should really be called United States B-squad or "Israel." This of course making light of the loose rules in international sporting competitions about who is allowed to represent which country. The IOC has done a lot to shore up their rules, and are in fact doing even more requiring residence and passports for those moving etc. The WBC, maybe not so much...

I figured it was worth an interesting dive in, so I went over and exported out all the rosters of all the WBC teams, and charted them by the birthplace of the players. This is of course flawed out of the gate, but lets take it at face value because that's how many people do:

Team
Roster
Born in Country Represented
Born in Country or Neighbor Territory
Chinese Taipei
36
36
100%
36
100%
South Korea
28
28
100%
28
100%
Japan
36
36
100%
36
100%
Cuba
35
35
100%
35
100%
Venezuela
36
36
100%
36
100%
Australia
34
33
97%
33
97%
United States
32
31
97%
31
97%
Netherlands
36
34
94%
35
97%
Canada
29
27
93%
27
93%
Dominican Republic
34
30
88%
31
91%
China
28
24
86%
24
86%
Puerto Rico
35
27
77%
35
100%
Colombia
32
22
69%
29
91%
Mexico
35
24
69%
35
100%
Italy
32
8
25%
8
25%
Israel
36
1
3%
1
3%
TOTAL
534
432

460


Some Notes:

  1. Why were China and South Korea so cocky they didn't even use the full limit of roster size and stopped at 28?
  2. "Born in Country represented" is literal. So even if someone moved to a country when they were a baby, it wasn't counted. 
  3. "Born in Country or Neighbor" was where I gave a little wiggle room to allow for times when someone is born near their country. For example some of the Mexican players are born in Southern California. that makes a lot of sense that a family might still commute across a border that close, many Colombian players born just across border in Venezuela
  4. The Netherlands, for this tournament is "Kingdom of the Netherlands" which means it includes Curacao (17), Aruba (4), and the Netherlands (14); their 2 outliers are from the Dominican Republic (counts as neighbor) and Utah
  5. Canada's outliers were from Florida and California, nowhere near the border
  6. Why place of berth is dumb?  You'll note that the US team is not 100% from the US because Alex Wilson was born in Saudi Arabia, just like Australia's Justin Erasmus was born in South Africa. Both moved to their represented country when they were kids.
  7. Why it gets abused. Erasmus' brother has represented South Africa before, but they lived together. 
  8. China has a bunch of players who technically have no listing info for birthplace but all of them play in the Chinese Baseball League so I just assumed they were from China.
  9. Puerto Rico is an odd situation because its part of the United States, but for the WBC its separate therefore I did not count anyone born in the 50 states total, only included them as neighboring. 
  10. Bruce Chen... wtf? Dude is born in Panama, played in two WBCs for Panama, but somehow qualified to play for China this time around?
  11. Just about every team is represented by natural born citizens as a majority, and the ones that dip (Puerto Rico, Colombia and Mexico) come up to 90-100% once you account for neighboring distance.
So lets talk about the outlier teams, or better said: How many Americans does it take to make an Israel or Italy?

Italy's team only has 8 players born in Italy, but its worth noting that 4 of its players born elsewhere currently play professionally and live in Italy. (more on this later)

Israel has only 1 player born in Israel? yep. But remember this situation is roughly where Italy used to be, and frankly the Netherlands for that matter. In fact this was the point of the WBC all along, to spread the game of baseball. both Italy and the Netherlands had breakout years in past WBCs and that's partly what sparked their uptick in baseball leagues and players. Their rosters used to look a lot more like Italy, and Italy used to look a lot more like Israel. That's progress.

How can you tell there is progress? Less than half the total players (534) in the WBC this year are playing professionally in the Major Leagues (150) or MLB farm system (109). That's progress in a sense for expanding the game of baseball. More professional baseball leagues are popping up or getting more serious now that there is a big tournament to play up to. These countries and their teams are being represented more and more by players from these leagues, rather than stretches of eligibility. Players who then grow to get a few MLB players just like soccer has tons of leagues but everyone wants to get to 2-3 top tier leagues.

24 Professional Leagues are represented in the list of where the players normally play. Three of those leagues were founded shortly before or after the first WBC in 2006, and 4 of the other leagues in the 80s/90s around when baseball was getting competitive in the Olympics before it was removed as a medal event. Some of the other leagues had been around for a while but added teams or added layers and more professionalism in the last 2 decades but there is expansion for sure.

Here's the top represented leagues:

MLB (US)
MLB Minors (US)
Nippon (JPN)
CNS (CUB)
KBO (KOR)
CPBL (TAI)
CBL (CHN)
ABL (AUS)
Honkbal Hoofdklasse (NDL)
IBL (ITL)
LMB (MEX)
CPBL (COL)
LVBP (VEN)
Chinese Taipei
3
3
25
South Korea
1
26
Japan
1
35
Cuba
1
34
Venezuela
26
5
1
4
Australia
1
12
18
1
United States
32
Netherlands
6
6
2
14
1
Canada
4
14
1
1
DR
29
3
China
1
1
20
1
Puerto Rico
20
7
1
1
Colombia
5
16
1
7
1
Mexico
14
11
4
6
Italy
7
9
10
2
Israel
4
22
TOTAL
150
109
47
34
27
27
20
19
14
11
10
7
6


You read that right, the most important thing in this entire post... There's a league named Honkbal Hoofdklasse, and our next mission is to figure out how to get it televised so we can hear announcers say it... that is all.